Part 1:
First conversation occurred without any use of verbal language, writing or sign language (ASL). I felt it was difficult to have a conversation with any detail. I don't know of a way to articulate too many details without speaking or writing. It is like playing Charades. It takes way too long to portrait information to another using this method.
My partner that was attempting to have a conversation with me in this manner was getting frustrated because it was harder to convey anything with real meaningful content. He would try to have a more basic conversation in order to make it easier. Then he started asking more questions so it could be more of a simple reply on my end.
I feel I was more in control of the conversation due to my lack of communication. My partner had to cater to my abilities or inabilities. My partner had control of the subjects and the limits of the topics though. He would bring up topics or subjects that were easier to convey responses to. He would simplify the information more and more until it seemed to be a comfort level that we could attempt to communicate at. After a few minutes, my partner would just ask me questions that I could basically answer yes or no, with minimal detail.
I think we both had different power in the conversation. I had the power of limitation and he had the power of content as well as topic.
If my partner and myself represented two different cultures, I believe he would have all the power. He would be able to articulate way more complicated information than I could. He could articulate to larger masses of people. I would only be able to show others basic ideas with a smaller number of people and it might not even be conveyed.
I think a speaking culture would have superiority over a non speaking culture. You can work in mass if your able to communicate need and wants at a easier level. You would be able to communicate details that would be pertinent to many functions as a community and a progressing society. Also cultures believe it is a more dignified way of communication.
I can't think of any modern culture that does not have a way to communicate. Often times there is a lack of communication or misinterpretations due to language barriers. When people are unable to understand each other it can feel like we are on different planets. If you want to compare our communication with children, I could say in the beginning they are unable to speak. We have to start interpreting their cries, their motions and their fussiness. We start learning what they need and want through repetition and knowing their basic needs and wants.
Part 2:
Second part of this assignment I found difficult as well. I am known for being active with my hands when I communicate. I also use a lot of facial expression when I communicate. It was hard to control what I believe to be a natural reaction for me when I communicate. I was distracted by eliminating all the factors I needed to complete this assignment.
My partner understood all the information I was communicating but he was distracted by my lack of emotion and lack of movement. He is use to me portraying myself a certain way so he was anticipating more than just words. He thought it was harder to take me seriously because it was hard to know if I was being sarcastic, silly or serious.
This experiment showed that how we express ourselves physically is almost as important as the words coming from our mouths. Our tone makes people know the emotions behind the content. It's a way of expressing ourselves without having to use all the words. Physical expressions alert us if someone is lying, is uncomfortable, portraying something other than their words, love, respect, kindness and irritation.
Benefits to being able to read people's body language can help you survive by knowing if someone is going to harm you. It can help you gain resources by portraying trustworthy behavior. It can help you reproduce successfully because you are able to portray attraction or love.
I believe there are people that have difficulty reading body language. Generally I believe people that do not possess the ability to read people are often socially awkward. Generally they are easy to spot. They stand too close when people are clearly uncomfortable. They continuously push for a relationship that someone is clearly trying to avoid but be kind. I believe it is sometimes a positive thing not to read body language because you don't sense all the negative output you may be receiving and can go about being happy. Another positive thing about not being able to read people is if they are good manipulators, sometimes they will use more physical effect to get want they want.
In general, good description of both your experience and the experience of your partner. A little more detail on how you conducted the experiment would have helped your reader by providing important background. Who did you conduct this experiment with? Family member? Friend? Stranger? This will impact the results. Sounds like you just had one partner instead of multiple. Would your results have been different in a group setting? Where did you conduct this experiment? Home? Work? In public? All of these are factors that can change the result of your experiment and would have been good to include here.
ReplyDelete"My partner had to cater to my abilities or inabilities."
Did he really "have to"? Or did he choose to do so based upon his relationship with you (and this is why it would have been good to know who your partner was in this experiment)? If you conducted this experiment with a stranger on the street, would they have had the patience to "cater to you" as this person did? I suggest not, in which case, did you really have the power in this conversation or did your partner just let you feel like you had power... in which case was it really yours in the first place?
Good discussion on the attitude of the speaking to the non-speaking culture.
"Also cultures believe it is a more dignified way of communication."
Is "dignified" the word we are looking for? Perhaps "civilized" or just outright more intelligent?
"I can't think of any modern culture that does not have a way to communicate. "
But that wasn't the question. You do seem to connect with the correct idea later in your paragraph when you discuss language barriers. Think of how non-English speaking immigrants are treated and spoken to in our country and the push for this country to declare English as our official language.
You can look at the adult/child relationship as an example of this but parents have a vested evolutionary interest in maintaining communication with their offspring, so this doesn't parallel the situation. The child really does have the power in the relationship because of that drive to help their children survive.
Good description of your second experiment.
"Physical expressions alert us if someone is lying, is uncomfortable, portraying something other than their words, love, respect, kindness and irritation."
You've hit on a very important point there with regard to 'lying'. Humans tend to use body language as a type of lie detector. If spoken words don't match with the body language, we are more inclined to believe the body language and doubt the words. Think about how being able to detect liars might help an individual's ability to survive and reproduce.
There is a normal range of the ability to read body language, just like many human traits, with some being better than others, but there are those that actually have physical or mental barriers to reading body language, such as those in the autism spectrum or those who are blind.
I have to agree that it would be good to avoid being manipulated, but does that mean you would want to forego being able to read a person's body language? Or perhaps you would read it but be able to detect that they were manipulating you (related to the issue of lying mentioned above)?
Is there a situation were body language might actually mislead you and would be better to ignore? Do all cultures use the same system of body language? If you travel to another country, can you trust the information you read from their body language?
I agree with your part two immensely because I too tend to use my hands when I talk. Not being able to was a huge struggle becauase I wasn't able to express my self the way that i would have liked to. In my post, i mentioned that it was hard to not laugh because of the fact that we basically had to be monotone. It was interesting seeing that you had the same reaction! I also agree with your belief that those that speak have more power because i think when language becomes a natural occurrence, you are able to communicate faster!
ReplyDeleteI didn't think about the whole manipulation thing. Good point! I guess in this sense it is true what they say that ignorance is bliss. On the other hand I also like your point about how being aware can literally save your life.
ReplyDeleteBlair-
ReplyDeleteI find it incredibly interesting that you had a difficult time with the first part of the assignment. I suppose that because the person I was attempting to converse with was upset and needed to vent, it was simple to let her take over the conversation. I find it interesting that your partner had to dummy it down for you to be able to communicate. I never thought I would be in a situation that would make me have to realize how dependent I am on a balance of non verbal and verbal communication.